<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Comments on article "Pimp this rage"</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://base-art.net/Articles/70/" />
<updated>April 21, 2006 07:35 AM</updated>
<author>
  <name>Philippe Normand</name>
</author>
<id>urn:md5:11329</id>
<generator uri="http://pythonfr.org/">Alinea</generator>



<entry>
<title>phil on Pimp this rage</title>
<author>
<name>phil</name>
</author>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://base-art.net/Comments/201/"/>
<id>http://base-art.net/Comments/201/</id>
<updated>April 21, 2006 07:35 AM</updated>
<content type="html">
&lt;p&gt;About Rage, yeah it can &lt;em&gt;only&lt;/em&gt; manage and play videos, but geez, it seems to do it very nicely and the eye candy way. That's the main reason of this post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;About media-centers apps popping out every there and here, i agree there's clearly a big need on the market, and we're working on that particular field at Fluendo Embedded :)&lt;/p&gt;

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Jkx on Pimp this rage</title>
<author>
<name>Jkx</name>
</author>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://base-art.net/Comments/200/"/>
<id>http://base-art.net/Comments/200/</id>
<updated>April 21, 2006 02:32 AM</updated>
<content type="html">
&lt;p&gt;There is a bunch of this kind-o-stuff today. But most of them (perhaps all) loose one step. In fact you can do a lot of more stuff w/ a computer and a TV set. So just playing movies is a great stuff but not the killer-app.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think Microsoft has the biggest view with there media-center, mainly because anybody can provide apps for this &amp;quot;home&amp;quot; computer, and there is a market for that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right now there is several options:
- You have some geeky neurons, so you can go in the DIY way. Look at MythTV, or others..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;You aren't geek enought, if you only want to play DVD, and DivX you can use small UPnP players (I doesn't recall the name, but I used one 3 weeks ago. It doesn't cost a lot $200 ?)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;You want the most advanced TV stuff.. hum .. right now (here in France), the only way to have HD is throught the net. Most providers rent some custom decoder / recorder that are DRM compliant (I hope) and doesn't cost a dollar (or a Euro), since you pay for it in your global service. check out the latest FreeBox ;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other side, there is a market for a open system which provide the customer all the stuff, that computer should do.. but never achieve too. Mainly because they are to unfriendly.  I'm talking about:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;TV Recording&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;House stuffs.. heater, audio..&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Chat&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Calendar&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Personnal sharing ..&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a lot of work to do here, but once again for me Yet Another Tv Player is simply unuseful. We use too much small power out of a CPU, we can do a lot of more without too much craps (right now), and I really think that as usuable in the Yet Another World most developpers are looking in the bad direction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bye .. Bye ..&lt;/p&gt;

</content>
</entry>


</feed>
